Desktop version

Main > Forum > 1C:Enterprise Platform > Bugs and functionality requests to 1C:Enterprise platform > error executing query

Forum

Search UsersRules
error executing query
#1
Just came
Points:: 0
Joined:: Jul 31, 2024

Hello all!

I have an error while working with query builder; platform gives fatal error when executes a query (only when tring to take data from Accounting register).
The error details in attached *.png files, the error text is:

"Error executing query
Error executing the query POST to resource /e1cib/logForm:
, reason:
1C:Enterprise fatal server error. Application will be closed
"
and then drops the session, so I can only close or restart program.

I so the same (or maybe similar) topics here, but the solution was to update the version of platform (from 8.3.5 to 8.3.6), but I have this error in 8.3.8.2137.

Tried the "verify and repair" from configuration, didnt help.

More information:
OS: Windows server 2012 R2 Standart
Woring mode: Client Server
Platform version: 8.3.8.2137
Server: PosgreSQL 9.2.1


Can you please help with solution, what can I do? maybe try to update the platform, but not sure which version to use?

Profile
#2
Administrator
Points:: 0
Joined:: Oct 3, 2019

Hello!

Does the error occur when working in the Designer? Or in user mode?

Is the error reproducible on other work computers? Or just one?

Profile
#3
Just came
Points:: 0
Joined:: Jul 31, 2024

Hello, Aleksandr!

Thank you for response.

The error shown on screens above in first message occurs in user mode (both thick and thin client modes. tried to clear server cash, it didnt help) - in designer mode no errors then working with query builder.
Now, when trying to update database from designer mode, or when trying to dump/restore databese, windows just closes 1C, if needed, can also share windows logs with error.

Profile
#4
Just came
Points:: 0
Joined:: Jul 31, 2024

Aleksandr,

Forgot to answer last question, error reproducible on all computers (client cash also been cleared)

Profile
#5
Administrator
Points:: 0
Joined:: Oct 3, 2019

Hello,

I understood you, thanks for the full answer.

In your case, it is best to raise the platform version, that is, upgrade.

You have a very old version of the platform and the easiest way will be to upgrade to a new version, in which this bug has probably already been fixed.

https://1c-dn.com/user/updates/1c_enterprise_platform_8_3/

Profile
#6
Just came
Points:: 0
Joined:: Jul 31, 2024

Hello!

Ok, thank you, Aleksandr. I will try to raise a platform and will write here the result.

Profile
#7
Just came
Points:: 0
Joined:: Jul 31, 2024

Hello Aleksandr!

Updated the platform version to 8.3.25.1257 (other datas are same with first message: client-server mode; BDSM - postgresql 9.2.1; OS Windows server 2012 R2 Standart), error still exists, but in error details there is a little bit different information (screen 1 and 2 below).

Tried to "verify and repair" but also couldnt do it, gives error:
"DMBS error
42P01:ERROR relation "_document172" does not exist
" (the last screen in the end of message).

It maybe a postgre error, I will try to update the postgre version this weekend and share the result here (of course, if you have any other suggestions or oppinions about this mistake, will glad to here you).

Profile
#8
Administrator
Points:: 0
Joined:: Oct 3, 2019

What is the size of your database? Is there any confidential data in it?

If there is no critical data, I could take your dump and try to figure out the problem.

Profile
#9
Just came
Points:: 0
Joined:: Jul 31, 2024

Aleksandr,
Thank you! Its about 18GB (dump file of postgreSQL)
how can I send it to you?

Profile
#10
Administrator
Points:: 0
Joined:: Oct 3, 2019

Upload it to any FTP available to you :)

Profile
#11
Just came
Points:: 0
Joined:: Jul 31, 2024

Aleksandr,

I think I have solved the problem, dont know, if its a true solution, but I did next steps:

* In Postgres (bia pgAdmin III) manually serched the table named "_document172" ("postgreSQL server" - databases - "database name" - Shemas - public - tables), and founda that I dont have the table with such name, but found the similar one with "og" at the end (the full name of table in postgre was "_documeng172og"). Edited the name of table manually, by just deleting "og" at the end.

After, tested to do the operations, those was causing the error in program, and found that all works correctly, no error occurs more.

Not sure, how is this solution true (of not), but now I dont have any errors (in work mode at least). After the work day ends, I will try to "verify and repair" from configurator and check if it also works correctly.

Profile
#12
Administrator
Points:: 0
Joined:: Oct 3, 2019

Hello!

Unfortunately I don't know your name :-)

Very often, such "non-standard" solutions save us... The only thing is that I would recommend checking the data. Whether everything is in place

And it would be good to figure out what led to such an error....

Profile
#13
Just came
Points:: 0
Joined:: Aug 5, 2024

Hello, Aleksandr!

My name is Stanislav,

Yes, we have chechek the data, everything seems in place.

I guess, that the error started after one of "dynamic update". We decided not to do dynamic update (if its not so necessary and we dont have any other choices).

Profile
#14
Administrator
Points:: 0
Joined:: Oct 3, 2019

Hello Stanislav!

Nice to meet you :-)

Yes, it is better not to use dynamic update on older versions of the platform, that is true.

Profile
#15
Just came
Points:: 0
Joined:: Jul 31, 2024

Hello Aleksandr!

Nice to meet you too!

As I understood, in new versions (now we using 8.3.25.1257) we can use dynamic update? or better not to use it in general?

Profile
#16
Administrator
Points:: 0
Joined:: Oct 3, 2019

As far as I know, this bug has been fixed in the new versions...

But my recommendation is - if possible - update 1C in the traditional way.

Profile
#17
Just came
Points:: 0
Joined:: Aug 14, 2024

Why might using dynamic update be a bad idea?

Profile
#18
Administrator
Points:: 0
Joined:: Oct 3, 2019

In my experience, there have been a couple of times when using dynamic update that I have had problems with. Once it was a long time ago, on an old version of the platform, and the second time was relatively recently.

This is my personal recommendation - if possible, it is better not to use dynamic update.

Profile
#19
Just came
Points:: 0
Joined:: Aug 5, 2024

Hello all!

Thank you very much for your oppinions and recommendations! Will try not to use dynamic update if possible

Profile
#20
Just came
Points:: 0
Joined:: Aug 14, 2024

It's funny how the traditional methods literally always work best :)

Thanks

Profile
Subscribe
Users browsing this topic (guests: 2, registered: 0, hidden: 0)



© 1C LLC. All rights reserved
1C Company respects the privacy of our customers and visitors
to our Web-site.